Reconstruction of the entire maxillary in an irradiated patient, with an implant retained removable prosthesis, using implants in the zygomatic bone
Anestis Chrysostomidis, Dimitris Tatsis, Kontantinos Tsemberlides, George Papadopoulos, Vaia - Aikaterini Alexoudi, Athanassios Kyrgidis, Konstantinos Vahtsevanos
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Specialized Cancer Treatment and Recon- struction Center, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “George Papanikolaou”
Laboratory of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
DOI: 10.54936/haoms252101108
SUMMARY: Maxillectomy is the surgical procedure for removing tumors that affect the hard palate, maxillary si- nus, or nasal cavity, with the extent of the tumor deter- mining the scope of the surgery. Speech, aesthetics, and masticatory function are disrupted when these bound- aries are not maintained, necessitating some form of reconstruction. One available option for the prosthetic restoration of such defects can be achieved with the use of an obturator supported by zygomatic implants.
Materials and Methods: This case report describes the placement of two implants in the zygomatic region to retain a palatal obturator in a 68-year-old patient who underwent a Brown Class 2d maxillectomy for the re- moval of a clear cell carcinoma of the palate. The sur- gical obturator was stabilized after implant placement. Following the healing period, a temporary obturator was made from thermoplastic acrylic material. Mechani- cal retention for the definitive obturator was achieved through a ball attachment suspended from a multi-unit abutment on the zygomatic implants.
Results: The patient was monitored for one year to as- sess the functionality of the prosthetic device, with mi- nor adjustments made to achieve maximum functional success. The prosthetic restoration improved not only function but also aesthetics, contributing to an enhanced quality of life for the patient.
Conclusion: Zygomatic implants offer increased reten- tion compared to traditional obturators. A multidisci- plinary approach, involving the surgeon and a specialized prosthodontist with a precise treatment plan, proves ef- fective in the reconstruction and restoration of patients at various stages of treatment.
KEY WORDS: maxillectomy, obturator, zygomatic im- plants, dental implants, maxilla, head & neck cancer
REFERENCES
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Specialized Cancer Treatment and Recon- struction Center, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “George Papanikolaou”
Laboratory of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
DOI: 10.54936/haoms252101108
SUMMARY: Maxillectomy is the surgical procedure for removing tumors that affect the hard palate, maxillary si- nus, or nasal cavity, with the extent of the tumor deter- mining the scope of the surgery. Speech, aesthetics, and masticatory function are disrupted when these bound- aries are not maintained, necessitating some form of reconstruction. One available option for the prosthetic restoration of such defects can be achieved with the use of an obturator supported by zygomatic implants.
Materials and Methods: This case report describes the placement of two implants in the zygomatic region to retain a palatal obturator in a 68-year-old patient who underwent a Brown Class 2d maxillectomy for the re- moval of a clear cell carcinoma of the palate. The sur- gical obturator was stabilized after implant placement. Following the healing period, a temporary obturator was made from thermoplastic acrylic material. Mechani- cal retention for the definitive obturator was achieved through a ball attachment suspended from a multi-unit abutment on the zygomatic implants.
Results: The patient was monitored for one year to as- sess the functionality of the prosthetic device, with mi- nor adjustments made to achieve maximum functional success. The prosthetic restoration improved not only function but also aesthetics, contributing to an enhanced quality of life for the patient.
Conclusion: Zygomatic implants offer increased reten- tion compared to traditional obturators. A multidisci- plinary approach, involving the surgeon and a specialized prosthodontist with a precise treatment plan, proves ef- fective in the reconstruction and restoration of patients at various stages of treatment.
KEY WORDS: maxillectomy, obturator, zygomatic im- plants, dental implants, maxilla, head & neck cancer
REFERENCES
- Cordeiro, P. G., & Santamaria, E. (2000b). A classification system andalgorithm for reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects.Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery,105(7), 2331–2346.
- Carrillo, J. F., Güemes, A., Ramírez–Ortega, M. C., & Oñate– Ocaña, L. F.(2005). Prognostic factors in maxillary sinus and nasal cavitycarcinoma.European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO),31(10),1206–1212
- Brown JS, Rogers SN, McNally DN, Boyle M. A modified clas- sification for the maxillectomy defect. Head Neck. 2000;22:17- 26.
- Futran, N. D., & Mendez, E. (2006). Developments in recon- struction of midface and maxilla.The Lancet Oncology,7(30), 249–258.
- Bedrossian E. Rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with the zygoma concept: a 7-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxil- lofac Implants. 2010;25(6):1213–1221.
- Brånemark PI, Gröndahl K, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Petruson B, Svensson B, Engstrand P, Nannmark U. Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: tech- nique and long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38(2):70–85. doi: 10.1080/02844310310023918
- Kim DW, Park HJ, Cha IH, Yang DH, Kim HS, Nam W. An atypical case of rare salivary malignancy, hyalinizin clear cell car- cinoma. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;39(6):283– 88.
- Kauzman A, Tabet JC, Stiharu TI. Hyalinizing clear cell carci- noma: a case report and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(1):26–34
- Clark RK, Chow TW, Luc HW. Prosthodontic aspects of a new method for functional reconstruction following maxillec- tomy. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2000;41:21-4.
- Garry JJ, Donavan M, Garner FT, Faulk JE. Rehabilitation with calvarial bone grafts and osseointegrated implants after partial maxillary resection: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:743-6.
- Ali MM, Khalifa N, Alhajj MN. Quality of life and problems associated with obturators of patients with maxillectomies. Head Face Med. 2018;14:2.
- Markt JC. An endosseous implant-retained obturator for the rehabilitation of a recurrent central giant cell granuloma: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:116-20.
- Wang F, Huang W, Zhang C, et al. Functional outcome and quality of life after a maxillectomy: a comparison between an implant supported obturator and implant supported fixed prostheses in a free vascularized flap. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:137–43
- Heydecke G, Locker D, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS. Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Jun;31(3):161-8
- Carthy DM, Murphy N. Replacement of an obturator section of an existing two-piece implant-retained edentulous obtura- tor. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:652-5
- Buddula A, Assad DA, Salinas TJ, Garces YI, Volz JE, Weaver AL. Survival of turned and roughened dental implants in irradi- ated head and neck cancer patients: a retrospective analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Nov;106(5):290-6.
- Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, et al. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck.1996;18:323-334. Irish J,
- Sandhu N, Simpson C, et al. Quality of life in patients with maxillectomy prostheses. Head Neck. 2009;31:813-821.
- Ueda M, Hibino Y, Niimi A. Usefulness of dental implants in maxillofacial reconstruction. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1999;9(4):349-66.
- Rieger JM, Wolfaardt JF, Jha N, Seikaly H. Maxillary obtura- tors: the relationship between patient satisfaction and speech outcome. Head Neck. 2003;25:895-903.
- Mentag PJ, Kosinski TF. Increased retention of a maxillary obtu- rator prosthesis using osteointegrated intramobile cylinder den- tal implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;60:411-415.
- Doke J. M. Buurman, et al. Mastication in maxillectomy pa- tients: A comparison between reconstructed maxillae and implant supported obturators: A cross-sectional study. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47:1171-1177.
- Ozkan Cem Dilek, et al. A mini dental implant supported ob- turator application in a patient with partial maxillectomy due to tumor: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Mar;103(3):e6-10
How to cite this article:
View the full-text PDF: