Study of normal speech with rehabilitation in cleft soft palate with the Furlow technique.
Dr. Nikolaos Kechagias1, Dr. Elias Tourtounis2
DOI: 10.54936/haoms265765
SUMMARY: The aim of this study is to highlight that when cleft palate in the soft palate is repaired at the appropriate time, using the appropriate surgical tech- nique, the outcome for speech is better, and the compensatory effort in articulation (during speech) is reduced. However, intervention in the hard palate may affect facial development. The Furlow technique, when repair of the hard palate is not required and the surgical intervention is limited to the soft palate, does not have a detrimental effect on facial development or speech. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Furlow technique in the speech of infants with soft palate cleft.
Materials & Methods: 44 infants with soft palate cleft were included in this study, ranging in age from 12 to 13 months, including 24 boys and 20 girls. Their clefts were repaired using the Furlow technique. The patients were monitored for at least 4 years. At the end of the follow-up period, they underwent nasoendoscopy to assess velopharyngeal closure and a perceptual speech evaluation.
Results: 38 cases (86.3%) showed complete velopharyngeal closure, 1 case (2.2%) had marginal competence, and 4 cases (9%) had insufficiency. Normal velopha- ryngeal resonance was achieved in 38 patients (86.3%), while hypernasality was observed in 5 patients (11.3%). Speech therapy was beneficial for cases with hyperna- sality. The 4 cases with insufficiency required corrective pharyngoplasty surgery.
Conclusion: Repair of soft palate cleft using the Furlow technique at an early age results in favorable speech outcomes without significant morbidity.
REFERENCES
DOI: 10.54936/haoms265765
SUMMARY: The aim of this study is to highlight that when cleft palate in the soft palate is repaired at the appropriate time, using the appropriate surgical tech- nique, the outcome for speech is better, and the compensatory effort in articulation (during speech) is reduced. However, intervention in the hard palate may affect facial development. The Furlow technique, when repair of the hard palate is not required and the surgical intervention is limited to the soft palate, does not have a detrimental effect on facial development or speech. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Furlow technique in the speech of infants with soft palate cleft.
Materials & Methods: 44 infants with soft palate cleft were included in this study, ranging in age from 12 to 13 months, including 24 boys and 20 girls. Their clefts were repaired using the Furlow technique. The patients were monitored for at least 4 years. At the end of the follow-up period, they underwent nasoendoscopy to assess velopharyngeal closure and a perceptual speech evaluation.
Results: 38 cases (86.3%) showed complete velopharyngeal closure, 1 case (2.2%) had marginal competence, and 4 cases (9%) had insufficiency. Normal velopha- ryngeal resonance was achieved in 38 patients (86.3%), while hypernasality was observed in 5 patients (11.3%). Speech therapy was beneficial for cases with hyperna- sality. The 4 cases with insufficiency required corrective pharyngoplasty surgery.
Conclusion: Repair of soft palate cleft using the Furlow technique at an early age results in favorable speech outcomes without significant morbidity.
REFERENCES
- Randall P, LaRossa. Cleft Palate. In: Mc Carthy J, editor. 1st ed. Vol. 4. WB Saunders Company; Philadelphia: 1990. pp. 2723–2752. (Plastic Surgery. Cleft lip, palate and craniofacial anomalies)
- Furlow LT Jr: Cleft palate repair by double opposing z-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78: 724–736
- Randall P, LaRossa D, Cohen SR, Cohen MA. The double op- posing Z-plasty for palate closure—Part 2. In: Jackson Ian T, Sommerlad Brian C., editors. Recent Advances in Plastic Sur- gery. Churchill Livingstone; New York: 1992. pp. 41–44.
- Furlow LT., Jr . The double opposing Z-plasty for palate clo- sure—Part 1. In: Jackson Ian T, Sommerlad Brian C., editors. Recent Advances in Plastic Surgery. Churchill Livingstone; New York: 1992. pp. 29–39.
- Huang MH, Riski JE, Cohen SR, Simms CA, Burstein FD. An ana- tomic evaluation of the Furlow double opposing technique of cleft palate repair. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1999;28:672–676.
- Mc Williams BJ, Randall P, LaRossa D, Cohen S, Yu j Cohen M. Speech characteristics associated with the Furlow palato- plasty compared with other techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:610–619.
- Yu CC, Chen PK, Chen YR. Comparison of speech results after Furlow palatoplasty and von Langenbeck palatoplasty in incomplete cleft of the secondary palate. Chung Gung Med J. 2001;24:628–632.
- Sie KC, Tampakopoulou DA, Sorom J, Gruss JS, Eblen LE. Re- sults with Furlow palatoplasty in management of velopharyn- geal insufficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:17–25.
- Kirschner Re, Wang P, Jawad AF, Duran M, Cohen M, Solot C, Randall P, LaRossa D. Cleft palate repair by modified Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty: The Children’s Hospital of Philadel- phia experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1998–2010.
- La Rossa, Jackson OH, Kirschner RE. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia modification of the Furlow’s double opposing Z- plasty—long term speech and growth results. Clinics Plast Surg. 2004;31:243–249.
- Cheng NX. Experience with Furlow’s palatoplasty and its pre- liminary result. Zhonghua Zheng, Xing Shao Shang, Wai Ke, Za Zhi. 1992;8:43–44.
- Vokurkova J, Mrazek T, Vyska T, Peslova M, Vesely J. Cleft re- pair by Furlow double- reversing Z-plasty: first speech results at the age of 6 years. Acta Chir Plast. 2000;42:23–26.
- Guneren E, Uvsal OA. The quantitative evaluation of palatal elongation after Furlow palatoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:446–450.
- Cho BC, Kim JY, Yang JD, Lee DG, Chung HY, Park JW. Influ- ence of the Furlow palatoplasty for patients with submucous cleft palate on facial growth. J Craniofac Surg. 2004;15:547– 554.
- Raol, N. and C Hartnick. Furlow Double-Opposing Z-plasty. Surgery for Pediatric Velopharyngeal Insufficiency. Adv Oto- rhinolaryngol. Basel, Karger, 2015, vol 76, pp 67–73
- Salyer, K. Salyer and Bardach’s Atlas of Craniofacial & Cleft Surgery. 1999. pp 764-767
- X. Cheng et al. Age and preoperative velar closure ratio are significantly associated with surgical outcome of furlow dou- ble-opposing z-plasty in palatal re-repair. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. (2020)
- Perkins JA, Lewis CW, Gruss JS, Eblen LE, Sie KC. Furlow palatoplasty for management of velopharyngeal insufficiency: a prospective study of 148 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:72–80;
- C. de Blacam, S. Smith, D. Orr Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Mar;55(3):405-422. doi: 10.1177/1055665617735102. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
- F. Abyholm, L. D’Antonio, S. L Davidson Ward, L. Kjøll, M. Saeed, W. Shaw, G. Sloan, D. Whitby, H. Worhington, R. Wy- att; Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Sep;42(5):501-11.
- Mehendale FV, Lane R, Laverty A, Dinwiddie R, Sommerlad BC. Effect of palate re-repairs and hynes pharyngoplasties on pediatric airways: an analysis of preoperative and postopera- tive cardiorespiratory sleep studies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50:257–267.
- Yamaguchi K, Lonic D, Lee CH, Wang SH, Yun C, Lo LJ. A Treatment Protocol for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and the Outcome. Plast and Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:290E–299E.
- Priyanka Naidu, Caroline A Yao, David K Chong, Wil- liam P Magee. Cleft Palate Repair: A History of Techniques and Variations. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 28;10(3):e4019.
How to cite this article:
View the full-text PDF:
|
![]()
|