Instructions to Reviewers
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
Hippokratia General Medical Journal Seminar For Reviewers
Suggested reading:
Tandon R. How to review a scientific paper. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014 Oct;11:124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Aug 27. PMID: 25248566.
Alexandrov AV, Hennerici, MG, Norrving B. Suggestions for reviewing manuscripts. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;28:243–246.
Black N, van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? JAMA. 1998;280:231-233.
Drubin DG. Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review); MBOC 2011; 22:525-527.
Garmel GM. Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals. Permanente J 2010; 14(1):32-40.
Hoppin FG. How I review an original scientific article. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166:1019–1023.
Lovejoy TI, Revenson TA, France CR. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: A primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Ann Behav Med 2011 Apr 20. PMID: 21505912
Mark Spigta M., Arts ICW. How to review a manuscript. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63:1385- 1390.
Provenzale JM. Revising a manuscript: Ten principles to guide success for publication. AJR 2010; 195:W382–W387.
Roberts WL, Coverdale J, Edenharder K, Louie A. How to review a manuscript: A “down-to-earth” approach. Academic Psychiatry, 2004; 28(2): 81-87.
MA. McPeek, et al., The Golden Rule of Reviewing, The American Naturalist 2009 173:5, E155-E158
Triaridis S, Kyrgidis A. Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing. Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):5-12. PMID: 21487485; PMCID: PMC3049421.
Kyrgidis A, Triaridis S. Methods and Biostatistics: a concise guide for peer reviewers. Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):13-22. PMID: 21487486; PMCID: PMC3049416.
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
Hippokratia General Medical Journal Seminar For Reviewers
Suggested reading:
Tandon R. How to review a scientific paper. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014 Oct;11:124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Aug 27. PMID: 25248566.
Alexandrov AV, Hennerici, MG, Norrving B. Suggestions for reviewing manuscripts. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;28:243–246.
Black N, van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? JAMA. 1998;280:231-233.
Drubin DG. Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review); MBOC 2011; 22:525-527.
Garmel GM. Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals. Permanente J 2010; 14(1):32-40.
Hoppin FG. How I review an original scientific article. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166:1019–1023.
Lovejoy TI, Revenson TA, France CR. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: A primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Ann Behav Med 2011 Apr 20. PMID: 21505912
Mark Spigta M., Arts ICW. How to review a manuscript. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63:1385- 1390.
Provenzale JM. Revising a manuscript: Ten principles to guide success for publication. AJR 2010; 195:W382–W387.
Roberts WL, Coverdale J, Edenharder K, Louie A. How to review a manuscript: A “down-to-earth” approach. Academic Psychiatry, 2004; 28(2): 81-87.
MA. McPeek, et al., The Golden Rule of Reviewing, The American Naturalist 2009 173:5, E155-E158
Triaridis S, Kyrgidis A. Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing. Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):5-12. PMID: 21487485; PMCID: PMC3049421.
Kyrgidis A, Triaridis S. Methods and Biostatistics: a concise guide for peer reviewers. Hippokratia. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 1):13-22. PMID: 21487486; PMCID: PMC3049416.