REVOLUTIONIZING MAXILLOFACIAL REHABILLIATION: INTEGRATING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AND PROSTHETIC INNOVATIONS
Authors:
Dimitrios Raptopoulos, Konstantinos-Nektarios Antoniadis
Affiliation:
Doi: 10.54936/haoms242p68
ABSTRACT:
Objectives: This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of advanced prosthetic rehabilitation in maxillofacial defects, focusing on evidence-based approaches to achieve optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, encompassing electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Specific keywords related to maxillofacial defects, prosthetic rehabilitation, functional outcomes, and aesthetic outcomes were used to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were set to select high-quality research that investigated advanced prosthetic techniques in patients with maxillofacial defects. Data extraction and critical appraisal were performed to assess the study characteristics, methodology, and reported outcomes.
Results: The review of the literature highlighted the multidimensional challenges posed by maxillofacial defects, including impaired speech articulation, masticatory dysfunction, compromised oral hygiene, and psychological distress. Advanced prosthetic rehabilitation approaches were evaluated, considering factors such as prosthesis stability, material biocompatibility, patient comfort, and long-term success. The analysis revealed promising outcomes in terms of functional restoration and improved facial aesthetics. The incorporation of digital technology, such as computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and three-dimensional (3D) printing, revolutionized the field by enabling precise treatment planning and customized prosthesis fabrication.
Conclusion: The evidence-based approach employed in this study provides valuable insights into advanced prosthetic rehabilitation in maxillofacial defects. The review highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, involving oral and maxillofacial surgeons, prosthodontists, speech therapists, psychologists, and other healthcare professionals, to comprehensively address the functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial needs of patients. The integration of evidence-based practices, digital technology, and customized prosthetic solutions contributes to optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for individuals with maxillofacial defects.
KEY WORDS:
Authors:
Dimitrios Raptopoulos, Konstantinos-Nektarios Antoniadis
Affiliation:
Doi: 10.54936/haoms242p68
ABSTRACT:
Objectives: This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of advanced prosthetic rehabilitation in maxillofacial defects, focusing on evidence-based approaches to achieve optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, encompassing electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Specific keywords related to maxillofacial defects, prosthetic rehabilitation, functional outcomes, and aesthetic outcomes were used to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were set to select high-quality research that investigated advanced prosthetic techniques in patients with maxillofacial defects. Data extraction and critical appraisal were performed to assess the study characteristics, methodology, and reported outcomes.
Results: The review of the literature highlighted the multidimensional challenges posed by maxillofacial defects, including impaired speech articulation, masticatory dysfunction, compromised oral hygiene, and psychological distress. Advanced prosthetic rehabilitation approaches were evaluated, considering factors such as prosthesis stability, material biocompatibility, patient comfort, and long-term success. The analysis revealed promising outcomes in terms of functional restoration and improved facial aesthetics. The incorporation of digital technology, such as computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and three-dimensional (3D) printing, revolutionized the field by enabling precise treatment planning and customized prosthesis fabrication.
Conclusion: The evidence-based approach employed in this study provides valuable insights into advanced prosthetic rehabilitation in maxillofacial defects. The review highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, involving oral and maxillofacial surgeons, prosthodontists, speech therapists, psychologists, and other healthcare professionals, to comprehensively address the functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial needs of patients. The integration of evidence-based practices, digital technology, and customized prosthetic solutions contributes to optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for individuals with maxillofacial defects.
KEY WORDS: